Rivers v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Chief Judge.
Emanuel Rivers appeals his conviction of possession of cocaine. He contends that the trial court gave an erroneous similar transactions charge to the jury. We agree and reverse his conviction.
1. The trial court gave the following charge:
Sometimes evidence is admitted for a limited purpose. Such evidence may be considered by the jury for the sole issue or purpose to which the evidence is limited and not for any other purpose.
The law provides that the evidence of other transactions of this defendant that are similar in terms of course of conduct, the common design, scheme,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Foskey v. FoskeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Moak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Nickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.