Legal Opinion
Rolax v. Whitman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 15, 2002No. 01-4229UnpublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Sherron Rolax argues on appeal that the District Court erred by concluding that the first five counts of his complaint were time-barred and that his sixth claim was barred by the requirements of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act, N.J.S.A. § 59:8-3. We will affirm.
On motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, we, as did the District Court, are to assume that facts pleaded in the complaint are true, and to give every inference to the non-moving party. These facts depict an intentional violation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Greenway Development Co. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Green v. Auerbach Chevrolet Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Rolax v. WhitmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Edmond v. Plainfield Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Tripo v. Robert Wood Johnson Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- L'Henri, Inc. v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2010
- Agustin Garcia v. Patrick A. Nogan, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- BARTLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.