Bennett v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REEVES, Justice.
Appellant raises two grounds of error, contending: first, that he was denied a “neutral and detached” hearing body, and second, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.
A probationer is entitled to certain due process protections in a revocation proceeding. They include:
[Wjritten notice of the claimed violations of probation, disclosure to the probationer of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and present witnesses, a ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body, and a written statement by the fact finders as to the evidence relied upon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ruedas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Isaac v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Gerald Hooper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
- Sayles, Charles Reed Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
- Sayles, Charles Reed Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
- in the Matter of R.F., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015