Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Barclay
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 5, 2024No. 23CA0659Published
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY
September 5, 2024
2024COA100
Nos. 23CA0659 & 23CA0191, Azar v. Ngo — Attorneys and
Clients — Rules of Professional Conduct — Restrictions on
Right to Practice — Restriction on Right to Practice after
Termination
A division of the court of appeals concludes, for the first time
in a Colorado appellate decision, that an employment agreement
provision prohibiting an attorney at a law firm, while still employed
by the firm, from soliciting fellow employees to leave the law firm is
not an agreement that “restricts the right of a lawyer . . . to practice
after termination of the relationship,” as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Berra v. SPRINGER AND STEINBERG, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Williams v. Dominion Technology Partners, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.