Legal Opinion

MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Stefandl]

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 11, 2014No. D-49-14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2001, was suspended by this Court’s order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of BrammerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  2. Matter of BrammerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API