Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Aultman & Taylor Machine Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1915No. 19,277PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an action for personal inj ury. The plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. The automobile was driven by C. H. Glazier, agent of The Aultman & Taylor Machine Company, while in their employ and engaged in their business. Glazier ran into the plaintiff on a public highway. Negligence in driving the machine was alleged, and found by the jury. The defendants appeal.

Defendants complain that the court committed error in permitting plaintiff to file a reply, consisting of a general denial, after the case was called for trial, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rice v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Taylor v. HosickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Wright v. BachellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Grant v. PenderySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Deitz v. RegnierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kornec v. Mike Horse Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Southern v. Western States Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Farmers State Bank v. BrennekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Klippel v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API