Legal Opinion

People v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1976No. Docket 58668PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant alleges that his guilty plea was induced by his attorney’s representation that the prosecutor had promised to recommend a minimum sentence of ten years. Defendant and his attorney told the circuit judge at the plea proceeding that the plea was not the result of any promises. Defendant was in fact sentenced to a minimum term of 20 years.

A different circuit judge later conducted an evidentiary hearing on his claim. Defense counsel testified that the prosecutor and an assistant prosecutor had said they would probably not recommend more than a ten-year minimum. He relayed this exact…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re ValleMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. ByrdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. BelangerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. ArmstrongMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. In Re Oakland ProsecutorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. BoldenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API