Legal Opinion

Virden v. City of Austin Texas

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided May 21, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00271Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION JENNIFER VIRDEN, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § 1:21-CV-271-RP § CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, § § Defendant. § ORDER Before the Court is Defendant City of Austin, Texas’s (“City” or “Austin”) Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. 14). Plaintiff Jennifer Virden (“Virden”) filed a response, the City replied, and Virden filed a sur-reply with leave from the Court. (Dkts. 17, 18, 20; Text Order, 5/20/21). Having considered the parties’ briefs, the record, and the relevant law, the Court finds that the motion should be denied I.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API