Virden v. City of Austin Texas
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION JENNIFER VIRDEN, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § 1:21-CV-271-RP § CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, § § Defendant. § ORDER Before the Court is Defendant City of Austin, Texas’s (“City” or “Austin”) Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. 14). Plaintiff Jennifer Virden (“Virden”) filed a response, the City replied, and Virden filed a sur-reply with leave from the Court. (Dkts. 17, 18, 20; Text Order, 5/20/21). Having considered the parties’ briefs, the record, and the relevant law, the Court finds that the motion should be denied I.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.