Legal Opinion

Ault Aerial Applicators, Inc. v. Irvine

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1984No. 83CA0742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE * , Justice.

Defendant, Mel Irvine, appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Ault Aerial Applicators, Inc., for specific performance to convey an undivided one-half interest in an airplane hangar and for attorney fees. We affirm.

The dispute between the parties concerned the terms of their oral agreement with respect to an airplane hangar owned by defendant. The plaintiffs complaint alleged that the defendant agreed to sell it a one-half interest in the airplane hangar for $7,500; that, pursuant to the agreement, plaintiff paid the defendant $7,500; and that, despite plaintiffs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. L.U. Cattle Co. v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Steeby v. FialColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Agland, Inc. v. Koch Truck Line, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Smith v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Ace Title Co. v. Casson Const. Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API