Legal Opinion

Linn v. Mahler

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.

Defendant moves for judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the contract upon which the complaint is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds (see Personal Property Law, § 31). The motion is made under the provisions of subdivision 7 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice.

The action is brought to recover for commissions arising out of the sale of certain companies known as Peerless Pipe & Foundry Company and Dixie Pipe & Foundry Company. The plaintiff and defendants were brokers and plaintiff, who had first been engaged by the said two companies…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. High v. PritzkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shapiro v. 123 Cedar St. Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API