Legal Opinion

H. R. Anderson v. Swift & Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1967No. 17108_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellant Anderson, a meat curer, ordered from appellee, Swift & Company, 1,453 fresh, green-skinned hams weighing an average of 14 pounds each. Swift knew that these hams were to be used for “country curing,” by appellant, as distinguished from “city cured” hams, or hams cured by other processes. The hams were delivered by Swift but did not respond to appellant’s curing process. They were either spoiled at the time of delivery, as claimed by appellant, or became spoiled after delivery, as claimed by Swift & Company.

Appellant sued for damages for the delivery…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Utilities Appliance Co. v. Toon's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Nowak v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Gorman v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bryant v. Hercules IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API