Legal Opinion

Martinal v. Lake O' Woods Club, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1965No. 20,068Published

1Opinion

On Petition foe Rehearing

CARSON, J.

— The appellants have filed their petition for rehearing in four paragraphs.

In paragraph one the same cases are cited as were included in appellants’ original brief. We do not disagree with the rule of law as enunciated in those cases but we do not think it applies to the facts in the case before us. In the first trial the court determined that the appellants had cer*367tain rights as riparian owners. The appellants now seek to bar the rights of the appellee by extending the effect of that first judgment far beyond what we think we could have been contemplated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martinal v. Lake O' Woods Club, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API