Martinal v. Lake O' Woods Club, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion
On Petition foe Rehearing
CARSON, J.
— The appellants have filed their petition for rehearing in four paragraphs.
In paragraph one the same cases are cited as were included in appellants’ original brief. We do not disagree with the rule of law as enunciated in those cases but we do not think it applies to the facts in the case before us. In the first trial the court determined that the appellants had cer*367tain rights as riparian owners. The appellants now seek to bar the rights of the appellee by extending the effect of that first judgment far beyond what we think we could have been contemplated…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martinal v. Lake O' Woods Club, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965