Legal Opinion

Hines v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided October 14, 1998No. 09-97-137 CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Justice.

A jury convicted Mitchell Hines of possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, in an amount more than 1 gram but less than 4 grams. The jury assessed punishment at thirty years of imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. The two points of error raised on appeal raise the following issues:

Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain Appellant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance because the State failed to prove that the adulterants and/or dilutants were added with the intent to increase quantity.

Whether the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Cawthon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edwards, Brandon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2002
  2. Garrett William Fife v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  3. Garrett William Fife v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  4. Garrett William Fife v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  5. Jessie Lee Tatom v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API