Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Simpson v. Highland Irr.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 24, 1995No. 94SA136PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack

Defendants-Appellants The Highland Irrigation Company and The Nine Mile Canal Company (the defendants) appeal a ruling by the District Court, Water Division 2 (the water court), which enjoined the defendants from diverting water in contradiction to the orders of the Division Engineer for Water Division 2 (the division engineer). The water court held that the defendants were without standing to assert, as an affirmative defense to the injunction action initiated by the People of the State of Colorado (the State), that the division engineer’s curtailment orders were invalid.

We find that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. FullerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. StageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Ferguson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Goldin v. BartholowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Mortgage Investments Corp. v. Battle Mountain Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. Board of Educ. of Jefferson Co. v. WilderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Shirola v. Turkey Cañon Ranch Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People ex rel. J.C.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API