Legal Opinion
Martin Oil Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1999No. 22622PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff Martin Oil Company, the owner of an outdoor advertising sign, appeals the judgment of the trial court affirming the Commission’s decision that its billboard violated 7 C.S.R. 10-6.060(3)(B), and therefore was subject to removal. The facts presented to the Commission and contained in its Findings follow.
Appellant owns and maintains an outdoor advertisement sign adjacent to Interstate 44 in Newton County, erected in 1966. The billboard is visible from the main traveled way and is located within 660 feet of 1-44, part of the interstate highway system. Responding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mills v. Federal Soldiers Home of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Hulshof v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Blevins Asphalt Construction Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Superior Outdoor Advertising Co. v. State Highway Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boyce Industries, Inc. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ocvina v. Board of AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Arnold Shute v. Board of Zoning Adjustments of Franklin County, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- Garcia, Jonathan AdrianCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2022
- Hernandez, RolandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Sultany Trucking, LLC and Sultany Farms, LLC v. Missouri Clean Water Commission and Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.