Legal Opinion

Tabler v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1887PublishedCited by 36 opinions

. Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court. — Hon. James- • M. Davis, Judge. (1) Plaintiff cannot recover because the derrick was-placed in the centre of the train. He knew its position and voluntarily proceeded on the journey after such knowledge.

Read the full summary

. Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court. — Hon. James- • M. Davis, Judge. (1) Plaintiff cannot recover because the derrick was-placed in the centre of the train. He knew its position and voluntarily proceeded on the journey after such knowledge. Hayden v. Manufacturing Co., 29 Conn: 1548; Hudleston v. Lowell, 102 Mass. 585; Kroyn v. Railroad, 32 la. 361; JDevitt v. Railroad, 50 Mo. 305 ; Smith v. Railroad, 69 Mo. 32. (2) The act of placing the derrick car in the center of the train was-the act of a fellow-servant and not the act of the master, and for this reason plaintiff cannot recover on…

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The plaintiff, a bridge carpenter, in the employ of the defendant, brought this suit to recover damages for injuries received under the following circumstances : A passenger train was wrecked at Bevier .station, at two o’clock, on the morning of the first of March, 1881. The defendant caused a wrecking and relief train to be made up at Brookfield, a station west of Bevier; this train, composed of an engine, flat cars, a •derrick car, caboose, and a passenger coach, all coupled together in the order named, started for the scene of the •wreck at four o’ clock of the same morning, with physi*83cians…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Porter v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Leslie v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. Norton v. IttnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Siela v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gratiot v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Russ v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Miller v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Van Bibber v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  5. Grattis v. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API