Austin v. Dick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This is an appeal taken to obtain a modification of a judgment in an election contest.
*200It appears from the complaint that at the general election, November 8,1892, plaintiff and defendant were candidates, and the only persons voted for, for the office of supervisor of the third supervisorial district in the county of Modoc; and that at such election plaintiff received eighty-seven, and defendant eighty-five, votes; that the votes were canvassed November 14,1892, but the board refused to declare plaintiff elected, and afterwards, on the 8th of December of the same year, declared the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Tazwell v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Powers v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Maddux v. WalthallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Howe v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Sunset Lumber Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.