Legal Opinion
Donald W. Kreuzer, D.M.D. v. American Academy of Periodontology
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 26, 1984No. 83-1394PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge:
This private antitrust action challenges the legality of one of the American Academy of Periodontology’s (“AAP” and “Periodontists”) requirements for active membership, specifically the “limited practice requirement”. The plaintiff-appellant is Donald W. Kreuzer, D.M.D., a periodontist who practices in the District of Columbia. The defendant-appellees are the AAP and the American Dental Association (“ADA”). Dr. Kreuzer contends that the limited practice requirement is an unreasonable restraint of trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. 1
On…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Capital Imaging Associates, P.C. v. Mohawk Valley Medical Associates, Inc., Mohawk Valley Physicians Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital, Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Iris McKinney v. Honorable Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Weiss v. York HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.