Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bly v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1978No. CR 77-193Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the reversal of the judgment in this case. First, but perhaps incidentally, I disagree with the statement that there is no substantial evidence of robbery.

Bly admitted that he knew that Burns had $4.00 when Bly, Burns and Tumbleson started riding around with Tumbleson as chauffeur. He admits that he and Burns had a disagreement when Burns refused to pay $2.00 for some gasoline. Bly admitted that he knew that Burns had $2.00 left in his billfold after paying for the gasoline. Bly didn’t know whether he had any money himself at the time. The billfold was found empty…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  4. Abbott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API