Legal Opinion

Pullman v. Willets

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 15, 1885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Hearing of objection to account of administrator of decedent’s estate, in proceedings for judicial settlement.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

Objection is made to the allowance of an item of $120, paid to J. H. Chadsey for legal services. It appears from the evidence that the services in question were rendered by the attorney at the time of taking the inventory, and also that he instituted proceedings under Code Civ. Pro., ch. 18, tit. 4, art. 1, to discover property which the administrator claimed belonged to the estate but was withheld from him by Mrs. Pullman.

The charge made by Mr. Chadsey for his «services seems to be reasonable, considering the time spent by him in the performance thereof. The administrator,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collier v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Campbell v. PurdyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Van Nostrand's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API