Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Associated Theaters

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1929No. Docket No. 86, Calendar No. 34,300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

August 23, 1923, the corporate defendants, by Robertson, who was president of both, contracted in writing to sell plaintiff a house and barn, to be removed from the premises, for $1,000, of which $100 was paid down, $400 August 27th. Defendants did not own the premises but Associated Theaters Corporation had contracted to purchase them. Plaintiff was to pay the balance of the purchase' price of the house and barn upon showing of title in defendants and upon delivery to him of good title papers and possession, and was to remove the buildings within 30 days after receiving possession.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Weaver Mercantile Co. v. ThurmondWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Thatcher v. RockwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Griffin v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Hahlo v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Paradise v. Vogtlandische Maschinen-FabrikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API