Legal Opinion
McNeill v. Tarumianz
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 24, 1956No. Civ. A. 1715PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Judge.
The matter before the court is on motions to dismiss 1 for failure to state a claim against the defendants upon which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.
Two issues are raised by the defendants’ motions: (1) whether the cause of action is barred by the applicable Delaware statute of limitations, and (2), if the action is not barred by the limitations statute, whether there was adequate notice for retraction given to the defendant, The News-Journal Company, as required by 10 Delaware Code, Section 3919 2 and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- International & G. N. R. Co. v. EdmundsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Norton v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Johnson v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Patterson v. VincentSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
- Cole v. Delaware League for Planned Parenthood, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Avallone v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- In Re Dillard Department Stores, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Read v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.