Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Petition by Fred H. Greek for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, opposed by the Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company, employer. Judgment for petitioner, and the employer petitions for writ of certiorari. The statement of facts contained in, the record is not so specific as required by section 28 of the Compensation Act. 110 Ala. 115, 20 South. 57; 71 Ala. 461; 87 Atl. 86; 84 ISÍ.
Read the full summary
Petition by Fred H. Greek for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, opposed by the Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company, employer. Judgment for petitioner, and the employer petitions for writ of certiorari. The statement of facts contained in, the record is not so specific as required by section 28 of the Compensation Act. 110 Ala. 115, 20 South. 57; 71 Ala. 461; 87 Atl. 86; 84 ISÍ. J. Law, 117, 86 Atl. 529; 89 N. J. Law, 150, 97 Atl. 723; 89 N. J. Law, 601, 99 Atl. 345; 101 Ala. 79, 14 South. 98; Honnold on Workmen’s Compensation, §§ 238-248. The finding does not support the…
1ConcurrenceAnderson, C. J.
(specially concurring). Section 28 of the AVorkman’s Compensation Act, among other things, provides that the determination of the judge “shall be filed in writing with the clerk of the said court * * * and shall contain a statement of the law and facts and conclusions as determined by said judge.” We think the word “facts,” as used, is equivalent to the proven facts of tlie case. Odom v. State, 172 Ala. 383, 55 South. 820; Hess v. Corwin, 100 Mo. App. 22, 84 S. W. 141. Therefore, when the trial judge sets out the facts, the law, and conclusion as required by the statute and files the sam'e it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Ex Parte W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Odom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Hess v. CorwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904