Commonwealth v. Baynton

4 U.S. 282 (____)

4 Dall. 282

The Commonwealth

versus

Baynton et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

M`Kean, (attorney-general) and Dallas for the commonwealth.

Rawle, for the defendants.

The COURT, in the charge, directed the jury, in point of law, to confine the responsibility of the sureties, to a deficit occurring during the year, ensuing the date of the bond. But if, from the evidence, they were satisfied, that there was a deficit, during that year, they thought, that a verdict should be in favour of the commonwealth for the amount.

Verdict for the defendants.[(1)]

NOTES

[(1)] It may be proper to…