Huebel v. Bernard
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard
The appeal in this case is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an' interference case awarding priority to William Bernard of invention of an improvement in soap and sponge holders for attachment to bathtubs.
The issue of the controversy was thus defined in the Patent Office:
“1. As an article, of manufacture, a combined holder comprising a rectangular top frame which constitutes the *511upper open portion of the holder, a cross-wire secured to this frame for dividing it into sections, receptacles of different depths depending from each of these sections, the back of the deeper section…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Agawam Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
3Cited by1 opinion
- Owens v. SponableCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934