Morgan v. State

OPINION OF THE COURT

THIS CAUSE comes before this Court on appeal of a judgment of direct criminal contempt entered against appellant, Kayo Morgan, pursuant to Rule 3.830, Fla. R. Crim. P. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by entering a finding of criminal contempt against him as no contempt in fact occurred. Furthermore, appellant contends that the record fails to show that an order of the trial court was violated.

*61During a jury trial before Judge Spechler in February of 1989, appellant was acting as attorney for the defendant in a misdemeanor child abuse case. During the course…