King v. Brookfield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from special term, Kings county. Action by Terence King against William Brookfield and another, as receivers of the Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Company. From an order denying defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHirschberg, J.
The action is for damages alleged to have been occasioned by the defendants’ negligence. The plaintiff was working as an employe of the defendants in a certain mill, containing engines, boilers, furnaces, machinery, and a mechanical stoker device. The complaint alleges that on or about the 13th day of February, 1901, the “defendants so negligently managed and operated the said machinery, furnaces, boilers, and stoker, and so negligently conducted *605the work maintained by them as aforesaid, and so negligently exposed the plaintiff to danger without notice or neglect on his part, and so…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Wilson v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900