Mayo v. Mattiza
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BISSETT, Justice.
This is a will contest. Walter H. Matti-za, the decedent, executed a self-proving will on July 28, 1966 leaving all of his property to his surviving wife, Dorothy Mattiza, proponent of the will in the lower courts. James Henry Mayo and Diane Mayo, contestants in the courts below, contested the offer of probate of that will. They contended that it had been revoke! by the testator by the execution of a late, holographic will. The judge of the Probate Court of Nueces County, Texas refused to admit either the July 28, 1966 will or the alleged holographic will to probate as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Lynch v. RickettsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Brackenridge v. Roberts and McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Brackenridge v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Estate of PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976