Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Slaten

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1932No. 7 Div. 853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The plaintiffs in this action claim damages of the defendant for the conversion by him of certain crops raised by plaintiffs during the year 1930, on the lands of defendant, which plaintiffs claim they planted and cultivated as tenants of defendant under an agreement whereby defendant was tó furnish the land, teams, and one-half the fertilizer, and plaintiffs were to furnish the labor and one-half the fertilizer; the crops, when raised and gathered, to be divided equally.

The contract as set out in the pleading and testified to by the parties constituted an agreement by which defendant was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howton v. MathiasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Lindblom v. RocksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  3. Stewart v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fuller v. MartinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Goss v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mitchell-Huntley Cotton Co., Inc. v. WaldrepDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1974
  4. Townsend v. BusseyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API