Legal Opinion

Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 36,106PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtButzbb, J.

Burroughs Adding Machine Company, plaintiff, was insured by General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, defendant, against general and contingent liability of plaintiff for accidents arising out of the operation of automobiles, whether owned by insured or not. The liability assumed is shown by an indorsement on the policy, which states:

“The undermentioned policy shall cover the liability of the assured as in the policy defined as respects the use of any automobile or motorcycle which is owned, hired, rented, operated or used, by any agency manager, salesman or any person in the employ…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodmen Accident Ass'n v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Oakland Motor Co. v. American Fidelity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Howitt v. HopkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Howitt v. Hopkins, Burroughs Adding Machine CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kravat v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API