Vercher v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’CONNOR, Justice.
We are asked to determine whether a pretext stop violates article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution. We hold it does not and affirm.
The appellant, Cleve Vercher, was charged with the felony offense of possession of a controlled substance. In two enhancement paragraphs, the State alleged that he had previously been convicted of the offenses of possession of a controlled substance and delivery of a controlled substance.
After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, the appellant pled guilty to the offense and true to the allegations in the enhancement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nichols v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- People v. LeBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- In Re Houseman, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
- Magic v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.