Legal Opinion

Vercher v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 15, 1993No. 01-92-00922-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

We are asked to determine whether a pretext stop violates article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution. We hold it does not and affirm.

The appellant, Cleve Vercher, was charged with the felony offense of possession of a controlled substance. In two enhancement paragraphs, the State alleged that he had previously been convicted of the offenses of possession of a controlled substance and delivery of a controlled substance.

After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, the appellant pled guilty to the offense and true to the allegations in the enhancement…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nichols v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  3. People v. LeBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. In Re Houseman, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
  5. Magic v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API