Nichols v. Trueman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Greeley district court; Charles E. Lob-dell, judge.
1Per curiam
The motion to dismiss must be denied. The cause was submitted below on an agreed statement of facts, and a motion for a new trial was unnecessary. (Atkins v. Nordyke, 60 Kan. 354.) The only question presented to, or passed upon by, the trial court was a question of law.
The court held the tax deed void on its face because of its failure to state the address or residence of the grantee. The deed is a compromise tax deed, and had been of récord five years when this action was commenced. Since the case was decided by the trial court we have held, in Havel v. Abstract Co., 76 Kan. 336, and Trust…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lincoln Mortgage & Trust Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Atkins v. Nordyke-Marmon Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Havel v. Decatur County Abstract Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schubach v. HammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- McLeod v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Bowen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Cramer v. BrowneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Willey v. Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.