Legal Opinion

Henry v. Sheffield

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided April 16, 2012No. CA 09-332 SPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge.

Before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Defendants Richard B. Sheffield, Brian G. Bardorf, William R. Harvey, Quentin Anthony, Mary Jo Carr, and Harvey Carr & Had-field (collectively, the “Movant Defendants”). (Defs.’ Mot. Partial Summ. J., ECF No. 31.) The Movant Defendants move for summary judgment as to all claims asserted against them by Plaintiff Corinna Laszlo-Henry (“Plaintiff’ or “Corinna”).1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Background

The Court’s brief…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Morelli v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Felix Chico-Velez v. Roche Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Bowen Court Associates v. Ernst & Young, LLPSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chu v. Legion of Christ, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2014
  2. Patterson v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2012
  3. Carpenter v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2014
  4. Doe v. Portsmouth Abbey SchoolDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024
  5. Glassie v. DoucetteDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API