Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1996No. 1995-1196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 188.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BURKHART. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart,

1996-Ohio-121.] Attorney at law—Misconduct—Two-year suspension with credit for time served from November 12, 1993, with conditions for reinstatement—Convictions for theft in office and receiving stolen property. (No. 95-1196—Submitted November 7, 1995—Decided March 5, 1996.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 93-74. __________________ {¶ 1} In a complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGrathWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ShottOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BurkhartOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KouryOhio Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FuscoOhio Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API