Legal Opinion

Bernal v. The Boeing Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 12, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00533Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 PAUL BERNAL, CASE NO. 2:22-cv-00533-TL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEY FEES 13 THE BOEING COMPANY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Paul Bernal’s Motion for an Award of 18 Attorney Fees. Dkt. No. 80. Having reviewed Defendant the Boeing Company’s response (Dkt. 19 No. 82), Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 86), and the relevant record, the Court GRANTS IN PART and 20 DENIES IN PART the motion. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff brought suit alleging that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API