Eiseman v. Josephthal
New York Supreme Court
Aotiom' for specific performance of a contract for the sale of certain land.
1Opinion of the CourtMarcus, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff to compel the specific performance by the defendant of a contract for the sale .by the latter of certain land located in Tonawanda, Mew York, “free of all encumbrances.” It was stipulated that the sole issues involved in this litigation were:
First. “ Does chapter SOT of the Laws of 1900, of the State of Mew York, create a lien against the property which the defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff ‘ free of all encumbrances ’ for its just proportionate share of the .total amount of the principal and interest of the bonds issued under this *289Act, or, only…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gotthelf v. . StranahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Coles v. BowneNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Miles v. Dover Furnace Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Post v. LeetNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Bowman v. McClenahanNew York Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gordon v. MazurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954