Legal Opinion

Katz v. Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 19, 1964No. Gen. No. 64-18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoeth, J.

Plaintiff commenced a suit for specific performance to compel defendants to convey to him Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 in Block 198 in Park Addition to East Moline, pursuant to a written agreement to purchase. The following plat shows the location of the lots above:

The agreement to purchase , is dated July 19, 1961, and is signed by the plaintiff and by Robert C. Austin (a realtor) as agent for defendant Walter Anderson. The record shows that the City of East Moline had an easement for street purposes on what is shown on the plat as 10th Place. The street had never been opened and subsequent to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. HowardIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Leach v. HazelIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hajeck v. WyrickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Management Clearing, Inc. v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API