State v. Pedro
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of violating § 54-5-16, N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2), defendant appeals. The portion of § 54-5-16, supra, involved in this appeal makes it unlawful “ * * * to possess, * * * anhalonium, commonly known as peyote or pellote; * * * ” We need consider only one of the issues raised by defendant; that issue, which is dispositive, is whether the statute requires that possession of anhalonium be intentional.
Section 54-5-16, supra, does not state that the possession must have been intentional. In this situation, judicial construction of the statute is required.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. AustinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. ShedoudyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. GiddingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. MordecaiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. CruzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. FuentesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. MascarenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. JordanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.