Legal Opinion

State v. Pedro

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1971No. 660PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Convicted of violating § 54-5-16, N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2), defendant appeals. The portion of § 54-5-16, supra, involved in this appeal makes it unlawful “ * * * to possess, * * * anhalonium, commonly known as peyote or pellote; * * * ” We need consider only one of the issues raised by defendant; that issue, which is dispositive, is whether the statute requires that possession of anhalonium be intentional.

Section 54-5-16, supra, does not state that the possession must have been intentional. In this situation, judicial construction of the statute is required.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. State v. AustinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. ShedoudyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. GiddingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. MordecaiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. State v. CruzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State v. FuentesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State v. MascarenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. JordanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API