Legal Opinion

Burke v. Kleiman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1934No. 22255. Cause transferredPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellee filed a bill in the superior court of Cook county setting out that her predecessor in title, in common with nearly five hundred other persons in the locality described in the bill, who were either owners of or predecessors in title to the premises owned by appellee and those owned by appellants, entered into a restrictive agreement as to the use of the property described therein, including the property of appellee and of appellants. The agreement was made September 30, 1927, and was to expire by its own terms January 1, 1948. The restrictive covenant contained therein provided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. Commissioners of HighwaysIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Bucklen v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Stevenson v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Village of Harlem v. Suburban RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Bartley v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kling v. GhilarducciIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Anastaplo v. RadfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Housing Authority of Gallatin County v. Church of GodIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Rossiter v. SoperIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Burke v. KleimanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API