Legal Opinion

Wiedemann v. Brown

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1933No. 29,504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSEN, Justice.

Plaintiff brought suit in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis to recover possession of part of a building under the forcible entry and unlawful detainer statute. The complaint alleges that defendant, since August 10, 1931, has been a tenant of the plaintiff at sufferance of the premises in question, that before the commencement of the action the plaintiff terminated the tenancy, and that defendant wrongfully and unlawfully withholds possession thereof from plaintiff.

The court, after trial, found these statements of the complaint true and directed judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Cameron Tobin Baking Co. v. TobinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. North Star Land Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Rundlett v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kostakes v. DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Petition of New Ulm Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Johnson v. WisethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API