Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morelock v. Morgan & Bird Gravel Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1931No. 28750Published

1DissentO’Niell, C. J.

I do not subscribe to the ruling on either of the oppositions to the account or statement filed by the receiver.

I do not find any warrant for the ruling that the expression, in Act No. 199 of 1914 and Act No. 7 of 1926, save and excepting “the vendor’s lien and privilege which may he outstanding,” does not mean a vendor’s lien on movable property, but means only a Vendor’s lien on immovable property. The statute is dealing with the lien on both kinds of property, because its language is: “The sum so obtained shall bear a privilege on all of the property real or personal and the income of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Succession of CooleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
  2. Succession of BouvetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API