Kaufmann v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Linn
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s finding regarding the “other insurance” clause and would therefore reverse the trial court.
The majority has determined that our supreme court’s holding in Glidden v. Farmers Automobile Insurance Association (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 330, 313 N.E.2d 247, compels a finding that the “other insurance” clause is ambiguous and thus ineffective to prevent stacking of the two policies issued to the various members of the Kaufmann family. However, Glidden is distinguishable from the case at bar. Moreover, an examination of our supreme court’s decision in Morelock v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Doxtater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Morelock v. Millers' Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Bertini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.