Legal Opinion

Maurer v. Austin Square, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1966No. 5688PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal on questions of law and fact from the issuance of a permanent injunction. The action was brought under Section 713.13, Revised Code, to prevent an allegedly threatened violation of the Building and Zoning Codes of the city of Barberton.

Appellees are property owners in the vicinity of a proposed "shopping center." Appellant Austin Square, Inc., is the owner of a 26-acre tract in Barberton. The property is zoned as a "Planned Local Business District" (PBL) pursuant to a comprehensive zoning code adopted in 1960 (ordinance No. 129-A-1960). Appellants intend to erect a one-story…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grant v. Washington Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Early v. Leatherman, Treas.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whittemore v. Brentwood Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. McBride v. BehrmanHighland County Court of Common Pleas · 1971
  3. Austin Square, Inc. v. City Products Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. City of Jackson v. Mohamed ShehataCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Whittemore v. Brentwood Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API