Legal Opinion

Michael Alan Dean Hill v. Nicholas Millbank, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 21, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00782Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL ALAN DEAN HILL, 2:25-cv-0782-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 NICHOLAS MILLBANK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is detained at the El Dorado County Jail and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 He proceeds in forma pauperis and without counsel. This matter is referred to the undersigned by 19 Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is before 20 the court for screening. (ECF No. 12.) 21 The FAC states a potential First Amendment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API