Legal Opinion

People v. Schaafsma

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2005No. Docket 252696PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, P.J.

Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted his sentence of two to fourteen years in prison imposed following his conviction of a probation violation. We affirm. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).

Defendant pleaded guilty of uttering and publishing, MCL 750.249. The statutory sentencing guidelines established a minimum term range of nine to twenty-three months. Because this range permitted an intermediate sanction, the trial court’s sentence of one year of probation was within the guidelines. MCL 769.34(4)(c); MCL 769.31(b). Shortly thereafter,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. HendrickMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. ClineMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. People v. HersheyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. LockridgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People of Michigan v. Gregory Dean TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API