Legal Opinion

Noe v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 12, 1966No. 51731PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

The issue here presented is whether an action may be maintained in the courts of this State under a Louisiana statute which gives a right of direct action by an injured person against a liability insurer for the damages he has sustained, irrespective of whether or not a judgment has been first obtained against the insured.

The Louisiana statute (La.Rev.Stat. 22:655), in its parts here material, provides that an “injured person * * * shall have a right of direct action against the insurer within the terms and limits of the policy; and such action may be brought against…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. ElbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. West v. Monroe Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  3. Vowell v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATIONLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kirtland v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Doan v. Consumer Testing Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1998
  3. Dispenza v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  4. Lona Leann Grosshart v. Kansas City Power & Light CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API