Noe v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
The issue here presented is whether an action may be maintained in the courts of this State under a Louisiana statute which gives a right of direct action by an injured person against a liability insurer for the damages he has sustained, irrespective of whether or not a judgment has been first obtained against the insured.
The Louisiana statute (La.Rev.Stat. 22:655), in its parts here material, provides that an “injured person * * * shall have a right of direct action against the insurer within the terms and limits of the policy; and such action may be brought against…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. ElbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- West v. Monroe Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Vowell v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATIONLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirtland v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Doan v. Consumer Testing Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1998
- Dispenza v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Lona Leann Grosshart v. Kansas City Power & Light CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021