Smith v. Keim
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
The issue here before us is whether Frank B. Smith, an appointed police patrolman of Lower Moreland Township for a probationary period, is entitled to a hearing before the Township Civil Service Commission to challenge his removal from the force.
Smith had been appointed a patrolman on April 22, 1969. This appointment was made for a six-month probationary period under §640 of the First Class Township Code,1 as amended, 53 P.S. §55640: “All original appointments to any position in the police force . . . shall be for a probationary period of six months, but during…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mullen v. DuBois Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- McCartney v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Geis's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walls v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Mahofski v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Roth v. Borough of VeronaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bartal v. Borough of LaureldaleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Cosgrove v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.