Legal Opinion

S.S.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 16, 2004No. 3D03-3065PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

As the State properly concedes, a written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing. We thus reverse and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written order of probation to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements, which in this case means that the probation order should reflect that the curfew of 8:00 p.m. does not apply if the juvenile is working past that hour.

Reversed and remanded.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DenyaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. S.D.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. N.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. SDF v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005