Neice v. Chicago & Alton Railroad
Illinois Supreme Court
Writ or Error to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;—heard in that court on appeal from the City-Court of Granite City; the H011. J. M. Bandy, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright
The defendant in error, Maud Neice, administratrix of her deceased husband, L. B. Neice, recovered a judgment in the city court of Granite City against the plaintiffs in error, the Chicago and Alton Railroad Company and the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, for $3500 damages suffered by her, as widow, by the death of her husband, which was caused by a train of the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company on March 8, 1910, and the Appellate Court for the Fourth District affirmed the judgment. A writ of certiorari was granted to bring the record into this court for review.
A…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goelz v. GoelzIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- East St. Louis Connecting Railway Co. v. O'HaraIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. O'ConnorIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Wabash Railroad v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. BestIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Heidenreich v. BremnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Briney v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Ryan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Grinestaff v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.