Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 19, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Hobson, Commissioner

Affirming.

Harvey Douglass, Hobart Hart, Ernest Johnson, and Julias McNailey were indicted in the Boyd circuit court for the offense of unlawfully and feloniously having in their possession burglar’s tools, with the intention of using the tools burglariously. Johnson was placed on trial. He was found guilty and his punishment fixed at five years ’ imprisonment. He- appeals.

The first question made is that the defendant’s demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained. ■Section 1159, Kenutcky Statutes, provides:

“If any person shall have or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Keller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Morris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Anderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Lambert v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HefflinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. TilleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Pueblo v. Soto RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  4. Patton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Rogers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API